Triple, Quadruple, Septuple Freeways Bridges says Falcon's Astroturf Group

09/16/08

Permalink 09:13:42 am, by edoherty Email , 826 words   English (CA)
Categories: Gateway, Environment, BC Politics, Port Mann Twinning

Triple, Quadruple, Septuple Freeways Bridges says Falcon's Astroturf Group

Bizarre ‘study’ reveals conflict in BC Liberal ranks

Get Moving BC, an astroturf group run by people close to the BC Liberal Party, yesterday released a ‘study’ calling for a massive binge of freeway building. They say we need at least three times as many bridges over the Fraser as we have now. Why? Because they think greater Vancouver needs to sprint to catch up to cities like Calgary in the number of freeway bridge lanes we have per capita. Basically they propose doing what the US did in the 1950s, shoveling unending billions at urban highway expansion. I have not looked closely at what they are proposing, but would likely cost well over $10 billion. But you can’t build your way out of congestion with more freeway lanes; take a look at LA, Atlanta, Houston or many other US cities. The Get Moving funders (BC Roadbuilders and Heavy Construction Association, the Independent Construction Business Association, and the BC Trucking Association) stand to make big money off these freeway boondoggles.

But is this really how Gordon Campbell thinks he can win the next election, by promising to bulldoze freeways through yet more neighborhoods and reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the same time? No, to me this seems much more like an attack on Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts who days earlier called for a re-examination of the plan to twin the Port Mann Bridge. Mayor Watts is closely associated with the Liberal Party too, as is Peter Ladner, the NPA candidate for mayor of Vancouver. Ladner responded to the study saying: "The easy response is to build another bridge, but is that the long-term solution? Rapid transit is basically the answer".

The 1950s style 'freeways everywhere' binge advocated by Falcon and his Get Moving friends is completely incompatible with Campell's commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 33% by 2020. It does not matter if Campbell is serious about global warming or not, his election strategy is to paint the BC Liberals green.

It looks like the a significant crack in the BC Liberal ranks. And good news for the NDP.

'Total gridlock' without more bridges
Transportation group calls for three new eight-lane routes across Fraser
Kent Spencer, The Province
Published: Monday, September 15, 2008

A new transportation study predicts "total gridlock" in the Lower Mainland unless three new eight-lane bridges are built.

"The Lower Mainland faces the grim prospect of total gridlock in the not-too-distant future," says Patrick O'Connor, principal author of Bridging the Infrastructure Gap, a study done for the Get Moving B.C. transportation group.

"The bridges spanning the Fraser River are stretched to their limit," O'Connor said yesterday.

"Vancouver would need to triple, quadruple and even septuple the bridge infrastructure [to catch up with other Western Canadian cities]."

[snip]

The Get Moving study concludes three major new crossings are needed because another one million people are slated to take up residence south of the Fraser.

It says the Massey Tunnel should be replaced with an eight-lane bridge and eight-lane crossings should be added at King George Highway in Surrey and between Vancouver and Richmond.

Jordan Bateman, a Langley Township councillor and spokesman for Get Moving B.C., which lobbies for improve roads, bridges and transit, said the bridges should be paid for by Victoria and Ottawa.

"There should be a dedicated annual fund, say a billion dollars between them," said Bateman, who is vice-president of Forestry Minister Rich Coleman's riding association. "The feds could take their share from the billions which are given out to Ontario and Quebec. B.C. needs to get its fair share.

"There can't be huge generational gaps in building the city's infrastructure like there has been in the past."

Get Moving, which critics accuse of being a front for the B.C. Liberals, as its key organizers, including O'Connor and Bateman, have strong ties to the party, says most of the opposition for new bridges comes from the "city of Vancouver."

Vancouver Coun. Peter Ladner, who is running for mayor in November, said more bridges are not the solution.

"The easy response is to build another bridge, but is that the long-term solution? Rapid transit is basically the answer," said Ladner.

"Traffic coming into Vancouver is down at five bridges -- the Arthur Laing, Oak Street, Knight, Massey Tunnel and Queensborough. The main reason is because people are finding the 98 B line more efficient.

"Improving transit is reducing traffic on the bridges. When the Canada Line rapid-transit system opens next year, it will further reduce traffic."

kspencer@theprovince.com

BRIDGE CAPACITY Bridge Population

Metro area River Population lanes per lane

Vancouver Fraser 2.3 million 31 74,194

Edmonton N. Saskatchewan 1.1 million 42 26,190

Winnipeg Red 720,000 40 18,000

Calgary Bow 1.1 million 75 14,667

Saskatoon S. Saskatchewan 240,000 22 10,909

Source: Get Moving B.C.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Tell us by e-mail at provletters@theprovince.com, or by fax at 604-605-2223. Please include your name and address.

Full text at http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=ba3e777f-1ce8-4149-aa87-6d0d682b6957&p=1

Trackback address for this post:

http://www.livableregion.ca/blog/blogs/htsrv/trackback.php/592

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

Comment from: NicS [Member] Email
Hi Eric,

My take on this call by Liberal supporters to build more bridges is that we are seeing cracks in Gordon Campbell's plans to double the size of the Port Mann. Cracks in his Carbon Tax so big you could drive a Mack Truck thru, as evidenced this morning on CBC Radio when a member of Vancouver's Board of Trade was quoted live saying Gordo should back off for now on Carbon Taxes. Cracks with Mayor of Surrey, Diane Watts wondering out loud whether the Port Mann expansion is a good idea.

I sense that Get Moving BC is just trying to counter all this opposition to the Liberals transportation initiatives with a strong offense. If they say 3 more bridges are needed, they still hope they'll get at least the Port Mann expansion.

With the US bank collapses yesterday and reports that BC leads the country in real estate values dropping, the appetite for these large transportation projects may not exist after the May election and possibly even sooner.
PermalinkPermalink 09/16/08 @ 09:51
Comment from: Stephen Rees [Visitor] Email · http://stephenrees.wordpress.com
The "study" compares us Winnipeg, Calgary, Edmonton and Saskatoon. They have more bridges than we do. So what? And who said we want to be like them anyway?

There is nowhere in the world that has managed to reduce congestion by simply adding more roads and bridges. And at the same time, the ones that have followed this route have just created more sprawl. We decided in 1995 to create a Livable Region - where we could protect the Green Zone, build a compact urban region with complete communities and increase transportation choice. That is still the legally mandated growth strategy and no-one has ever shown what was wrong with the plan - just that we did not do nearly enough to implement it. Following the advice of "Get Paving BC" is a recipe for disaster, as the experience of most North American urban regions demonstrates. And so far as I can tell none of the four cities they hold up as exemplars have actually done much better.
PermalinkPermalink 09/16/08 @ 12:25

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Administrivia

Join the LRC!
604-736-7732

Search

The Livable Blog

Our goal as the Livable Region Coalition (LRC) is to provide a voice for those who believe that efficient and sustainable transportation is a cornerstone for the future of the Lower Mainland. We believe that through creating attractive transportation choices, encouraging urban density, and preserving green space and agricultural land, we can make our communities better places to live and grow.

We believe that the provincial government's strategy to pursue excessive development through the Gateway project is detrimental to the well-being of Greater Vancouver. The Gateway project's stated goals of reducing pollution and congestion will not materialize. Evidence for this comes from many sources. Instead, we advocate real solutions that will actually work and will be less expensive.

XML Feeds

What is RSS?
Add to Technorati Favorites

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 18

powered by
b2evolution