Corruption Investigation of Campbell Endorsed Policy

12/29/09

Permalink 11:33:31 pm, by NicS Email , 179 words   English (CA)
Categories: BC Politics, Energy, Hydro, Alternative Energy

Corruption Investigation of Campbell Endorsed Policy

Doug McArthur of SFU's Policy Centre explains how the BC Liberals Premier has endorsed failed Danish Policy.

"Danish Investigate Policy Copied by Campbell" (BC Liberals)

The Vancouver Sun profiled Premier Gordon Campbell on Friday in Denmark endorsing not the Copenhagen Accord, but the Danish policy of subsidizing private wind power at the expense of taxpayers. He claimed that Denmark sets an example for us if we want to develop clean energy. And indeed it appears that his government has been in many ways following the Danish example. Unfortunately, neither he nor his advisers appears to have taken the time to discover how wrong the Danish approach has turned out to be and how costly it will be to Danish taxpayers.../snip

snip/...Meanwhile, it is perhaps worth noting that on the very week that Campbell profiled the Danish program, investigators in Denmark commenced a corruption investigation into the arrangement there. Perhaps a closer look at what is happening here in BC is warranted after all. Especially since the BC program is almost a total replica of that of Denmark.

Trackback address for this post:

http://www.livableregion.ca/blog/blogs/htsrv/trackback.php/859

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

Comment from: edoherty [Member] Email
Yes private power costs more than public, and there is big potential for corruption, but that does not mean that wind energy should not be developed in BC by the public sector.

Coastal wind power is in fact extremely well matched to BC's seasonal electricity and natural gas demand. And dealing with daily fluctuations is not such a big deal in an area with lots of hydroelectric storage. Denmark does not have much hydroelectric storage, so of course they pay other countries for storage services.

It is time to do renewable power right, and stop the blanket attacks on renewable energy technologies. Renewable does not have to mean private.

Conservation is the greenest form of energy, and often the least expensive. And creating compact, complete communities with good transit is one of the most important forms of energy conservation.
PermalinkPermalink 12/30/09 @ 10:19
Comment from: Rod Smelser [Visitor] Email
I would advise Doug MacArthur not to bother Tzeporah Berman or Chris Hatch or Andrew Weaver or Mark Jaccard with his observations.

Rather like Liberals saying that national unity was so important the the corruption of the Sponsorship Scandal didn't really matter, we have people saying that "green" energy is so vital we need to put aside questions about pricing and about who benefits financially and by how much.

And what do these "green" energy advocates really demand from provincial public policy? They SAY that as long as there's a good enviromental screening of projects, everything is fine, they just need the appropriate prices from Hydro and a carbon tax to make fossil fuel alternatives more expensive.

What they MEAN is that they want a very, very lax environmental screening process so that as many run-of-river projects as possible can proceed, thereby maximizing returns to shareholders. They want very high prices guranteed for long periods. The carbon tax is a purely symbolic fig leaf which adds nothing to the basic economics of what's at play.

PermalinkPermalink 01/11/10 @ 10:43

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Administrivia

Join the LRC!
604-736-7732

Search

The Livable Blog

Our goal as the Livable Region Coalition (LRC) is to provide a voice for those who believe that efficient and sustainable transportation is a cornerstone for the future of the Lower Mainland. We believe that through creating attractive transportation choices, encouraging urban density, and preserving green space and agricultural land, we can make our communities better places to live and grow.

We believe that the provincial government's strategy to pursue excessive development through the Gateway project is detrimental to the well-being of Greater Vancouver. The Gateway project's stated goals of reducing pollution and congestion will not materialize. Evidence for this comes from many sources. Instead, we advocate real solutions that will actually work and will be less expensive.

XML Feeds

What is RSS?
Add to Technorati Favorites

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 29

powered by
b2evolution