DSF - Olympic Freeway = Greenest Games?

02/03/10

Permalink 11:39:13 am, by edoherty Email , 390 words   English (CA)
Categories: Gateway, Environment

DSF - Olympic Freeway = Greenest Games?

Strange math from the David Suzuki Foundation. They state that 2010 "will likely be remembered as among the greenest and most climate-friendly Olympics held so far." But the previous winter games included a pledge not to expand roadways for the games - so 2010 is a significant step backwards.

Greenest Games?

Or Freeway Olympics?

The scorecard lamented that the 2010 Olympics "will not leave the region with a significant legacy in sustainable transportation," choosing $600 million in upgrades to the Sea to Sky Highway instead of investing in sustainable transportation between Vancouver and Whistler such as through expanded use of the existing rail line.

"The new highway will encourage more vehicle traffic after the Games, exacerbate urban sprawl, and result in increased greenhouse gas emissions from transportation for the region...."

http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Vancouver+Olympics+earn+bronze+medal+climate+protection+efforts/2517316/story.html

I think that 2010 will be remembered as the greenwash games, where much of the spending was focused on increasing the most polluting forms of transportation. The money has been spent making it more convenient to drive (between $600 million and $1 billion for the Sea-to-Sky highway widening) and to fly (huge airport expansion and rapid transit to the airport).

The DSF report does critique one aspect of the Olympic green spin, criticizing the "20 hydrogen buses . . . purchased at a cost of $90 million. This money might have been better spent on a greater number of trolley buses."
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/files/climate/Climate_Scorecard_for_the_2010_Vancouver_Olympics.pdf

The 2010 games do not deserve a bronze, they deserve to be thrown out of the competition for cheating and green doping.

The question is if people will say NO to continuing with the freeway and airport expansion binge after the circus leaves town, leaving a huge financial mess left behind. The Olympics have blown a $6 billion dollar hole in our public purse, but Gateway is set to blow another multi-billion dollar hole in our finances. The proposed South Fraser Freeway alone could take another $2 billion away from transit, energy efficiency, housing, education, health care, arts funding, and other public priorities.

See www.gatewaysucks.org/freeway-olympics for information on how to get involved in scrubbing off the Olympic greenwash and stopping the freeway expansion madness. Hope to see you Fri. Feb. 12 at 3pm. (and stay tuned for information about the Feb 9 action in Delta)

Trackback address for this post:

http://www.livableregion.ca/blog/blogs/htsrv/trackback.php/872

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

Comment from: edoherty [Member] Email
My letter to the editor on this:

The 2010 games are not among the greenest ever, not even close. The previous winter games in Italy included a pledge to avoid any major roadway expansion.

The Olympic Sea-to-Sky highway expansion was not needed -- the existing rail line and highway would have been sufficient with modest upgrades. But Olympic insiders insisted on a $980 million highway expansion, deciding that a few minutes travel time for VIPs is worth increasing global warming and destroying wildlife habitat. The 2010 games are a huge step backwards for environmental standards at the Olympics and should be thrown out of the competition for greenest games in disgrace, not given a medal.
PermalinkPermalink 02/04/10 @ 13:22
Comment from: doviende [Visitor] Email · http://languagefixation.wordpress.com/
The South Fraser Perimeter Road has direct ties to the proposed expansion of the Roberts Bank Coal Port. This is where we make dirty money off selling BC Coal to other countries. Also, both the dirty highway and the dirty coal port will cut through environmentally sensitive areas. The surrounding Boundary Bay area is classified by Bird Studies Canada as "Continentally Significant".
PermalinkPermalink 02/06/10 @ 02:41
Comment from: Rod Smelser [Visitor] Email
There used to be a train to Whistler, but few people used it because it was much more expensive than driving. Even if gas were $2 per litre, it would probably have been cheaper, at least for two people, to share a car.

I think the big mistake with the Hwy 99 project is that it was not completed through to Hwy 97 at Hat Creek junction, and some sections have been left as two lanes with no dividing median, a dangerous thing. Extending the improved road through to Hwy 97 would have been more beneficial from a public policy POV, because it would have added another major link between the Lower Mainland and the rest of Canada and would have allowed for more commercial alpine ski developments along the eastern ends of that route, as well as allowing for traffic to approach Whistler from the Interior and Alberta without entering the Fraser Valley and Vancouver.

Could or should a train be operated along the ex-BCR line to Whistler, Pemberton and beyond? I think so, but for it to be successful in attracting passengers it would have to be subsidized. In the old days there was some cross-subsidy from the BCR's freight operations, but that wasn't enough to bring down ticket prices to an attractive level. Perhaps the model here is Amtrak, who apparently have a US subsidy sufficient to make their ticket prices more reasonable. A model which won't work is VIA, whose prices are simply out of the question for anyone who isn't a visiting lifelong train buff taking the journey for the journey's sake.

PermalinkPermalink 02/10/10 @ 09:01

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Administrivia

Join the LRC!
604-736-7732

Search

The Livable Blog

Our goal as the Livable Region Coalition (LRC) is to provide a voice for those who believe that efficient and sustainable transportation is a cornerstone for the future of the Lower Mainland. We believe that through creating attractive transportation choices, encouraging urban density, and preserving green space and agricultural land, we can make our communities better places to live and grow.

We believe that the provincial government's strategy to pursue excessive development through the Gateway project is detrimental to the well-being of Greater Vancouver. The Gateway project's stated goals of reducing pollution and congestion will not materialize. Evidence for this comes from many sources. Instead, we advocate real solutions that will actually work and will be less expensive.

XML Feeds

What is RSS?
Add to Technorati Favorites

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 23

powered by
b2evolution